Search Results
7/5/2025, 4:13:26 AM
>>714544049
BUT WHEN I SIT DOWN AND PLAY A GAME I SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO PROGRESS, NEVER LOSE MY PROGRESS, AND IF THE GAME IS ONLY 30 MINUTES LONG I SHOULD BE ABLE TO BEAT THE GAME WITHIN THAT SITTING. HOW DARE A GAME BE SO DIFFICULT I GET A GAME OVER, AND HOW DARE IT SEND ME BACK TO THE TITLE SCREEN TO DO EVERYTHING AGAIN. THIS IS OBJECTIVELY BAD GAME DESIGN, I'M LITERALLY SHAKING, THERE ARE NO GOOD OLDER GAMES. OLDER GAMES ARE JUST ANTI-PLAYER.
BUT WHEN I SIT DOWN AND PLAY A GAME I SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO PROGRESS, NEVER LOSE MY PROGRESS, AND IF THE GAME IS ONLY 30 MINUTES LONG I SHOULD BE ABLE TO BEAT THE GAME WITHIN THAT SITTING. HOW DARE A GAME BE SO DIFFICULT I GET A GAME OVER, AND HOW DARE IT SEND ME BACK TO THE TITLE SCREEN TO DO EVERYTHING AGAIN. THIS IS OBJECTIVELY BAD GAME DESIGN, I'M LITERALLY SHAKING, THERE ARE NO GOOD OLDER GAMES. OLDER GAMES ARE JUST ANTI-PLAYER.
Page 1