>>2047025
Why is this board constantly borderlining between 'Reeee you're not a real cyclist' and 'Reee you are poor'. I am definately not poor. Let alone homeless. Quite the opposite.
Idk how many discussions of that kind I had on this board where someone would first claim that somehow they can't make do without a car also they were rich hence they owned a nice car and I would use one if I had the means to. When I then tell them I not only easily have the means to but even have property on a scale that you may perceive as indecent they will claim they do not believe me. When I prove to them it is the case (idk even why I have a burden of proof or how it furthers the discussion) they immediately switch from 'you're poor' to 'you simply can afford to be a moralizing asshole as you never need to be anywhere on time, time is money im too poor to afford as much time as you etc.'
Funny enough I work a job and fucking vommute ~30 km.
Why can some people just not accept that people exist who consider their actions, think, draw conclusions and live by the result of their dialectic. Could it be that those types have a functioning moral compass but are too lazy to be an idealist and as a result feel unwell when someone is different so they demand everyone must just be like them: Able to tell right from wrong but choose the comfortable way regardless?
It's a bit annoying.