Think about it. It was something that was known to ancients as being supernatural, since consciousness acts independently of external stimuli, but due to sciences, had it normalized into believing that it was a natural process. A mind can think, process information, and act upon its own will, and as such, would routinely violate the laws of physics unless if a force greater than the strength of the body itself would force it to react to it (for instance, gravity pulling people down, which is natural, but jumping upon its own will, which is unnatural). Something that has to be normalized, isn't normal. It was to the point where, for instance, Marquis De Condorcet, a staunch atheist, believed that life itself was materialistic, and attempted to "prove" and "perfect" what he called "social laws" mathematically, believing that laws themselves are natural, even though laws are a construct of consciousness, and differs between animals (which may explain instinct). Consciousness, rights, and policy are all immaterial and unnatural, which would make them abstract ideas. Ideas themselves are abstract, and therefore cannot be material, but can instead by applied to other materialistic things. An idea cannot be conjured up by an inanimate object (artificial intelligence for instance, is just artificial and uses computations of binary numbers, just like other computers or robots, in order to analyze data to come up with a response to make it have the illusion of thinking or doing tasks, themselves abstracted and meaningless without interpretation, itself an abstraction).

What does this mean? It is empirical evidence suggested that the Universe has a Creator, and deals a blow to Leftist ideologies. For instance, human life cannot procreate without two separate bodies of having separate organs, even though it would not have any other logic for separate beings to have different organs for that, thus making homosexuality aberrant and illogical behavior which is an an abomination.