Search Results
7/2/2025, 1:28:02 AM
>>529578832
>I'm surprised they didn't replace the voiceover. It's word-for-word identical
Now that the evidence of direct copyright infringement is gone there isn't much reason to. They aren't using a modified version of the original audio, they just redubbed it. There isn't much now that the company behind the commercial can do.
>feels like a continuity error
It is as far as I know, just an alert that this company isn't nearly as successful as people think if they can't even shell out the time or money to modify an existing location.
>I'm surprised they didn't replace the voiceover. It's word-for-word identical
Now that the evidence of direct copyright infringement is gone there isn't much reason to. They aren't using a modified version of the original audio, they just redubbed it. There isn't much now that the company behind the commercial can do.
>feels like a continuity error
It is as far as I know, just an alert that this company isn't nearly as successful as people think if they can't even shell out the time or money to modify an existing location.
Page 1