Search Results
4/1/2025, 5:22:58 AM
>>11262434
>>11262495
I definitely agree that sex work should be the "third option". It's not slavery, but there are few protections, and in practice law enforcement and the courts rarely care about complaints from street walkers. This means if a man wants to satisfy his more disgusting or aggressive fetishes, he uses whores, since society raises men to have at least SOME respect for women who they actually marry.
While sexual harassment is the norm at work, and a woman's treatment and career prospects are going to vary depending on how much she's willing to debase herself, there's still a difference between dressing sluttily and getting groped, or sucking a dick, and being a full blown prostitute.
Maybe it's a double standard, where it's seen as normal, and even perhaps encouraged for unmarried men to "practice" with whores. Outside of fumbling early sexual encounters, an unmarried man's options are forcing one of his coworkers under his desk or hiring a prostitute. In this way ladies of the night are a bit better liked than other free women, but only because they rarely have limits, there's absolutely no respect here.
That lack of respect is the other side of the coin, prostitution reinforces societies beliefs that a woman's body is more valuable than her mind, and that without proper male guidance all women are naturally whores.
Any security they get is outside of the law, maybe the unicorn scenario where a woman earns enough to serve as a madame, or a man who offers "protection" as a pimp, a restaurant whose waitresses are obviously servicing customers. Each of these only gives so much safety however, and all come with a(literal) cost, meaning what used to be her only source of untouchable income now has her paying dues.
I imagine even married men would get a societal pass to "slum it" every once in a while, even if it's seen as something you don't publicly talk about. After all, what's his wife gonna do? Leave and lose everything?
>>11262495
I definitely agree that sex work should be the "third option". It's not slavery, but there are few protections, and in practice law enforcement and the courts rarely care about complaints from street walkers. This means if a man wants to satisfy his more disgusting or aggressive fetishes, he uses whores, since society raises men to have at least SOME respect for women who they actually marry.
While sexual harassment is the norm at work, and a woman's treatment and career prospects are going to vary depending on how much she's willing to debase herself, there's still a difference between dressing sluttily and getting groped, or sucking a dick, and being a full blown prostitute.
Maybe it's a double standard, where it's seen as normal, and even perhaps encouraged for unmarried men to "practice" with whores. Outside of fumbling early sexual encounters, an unmarried man's options are forcing one of his coworkers under his desk or hiring a prostitute. In this way ladies of the night are a bit better liked than other free women, but only because they rarely have limits, there's absolutely no respect here.
That lack of respect is the other side of the coin, prostitution reinforces societies beliefs that a woman's body is more valuable than her mind, and that without proper male guidance all women are naturally whores.
Any security they get is outside of the law, maybe the unicorn scenario where a woman earns enough to serve as a madame, or a man who offers "protection" as a pimp, a restaurant whose waitresses are obviously servicing customers. Each of these only gives so much safety however, and all come with a(literal) cost, meaning what used to be her only source of untouchable income now has her paying dues.
I imagine even married men would get a societal pass to "slum it" every once in a while, even if it's seen as something you don't publicly talk about. After all, what's his wife gonna do? Leave and lose everything?
Page 1