Search Results
6/11/2025, 3:29:53 AM
>>40507842
>you will state that micro-gravity environments (like the vomit comet) are fake
Nice strawman. Yet another perfect example of your desperate dependence on logical fallacies to compensate for the obvious lack of substantive evidence for your claims.
I never claimed that gas wasn’t affected by the downward accelerative bias. Gas molecules do have weight bc they have mass. The issue for you is that they don’t have enough weight to prevent them from moving omidirectionally and escaping UP and into a vacuum. Your religion claims that the bending and warping of spacetime is causing the earth to accelerate up towards the gas molecules which prevents them from escaping into the vacuum of space. This is a laughably ridiculous claim on the face of it, but if you actually did want to attempt to scientifically substantiate it, you would first need to isolate the variable of “bending space time” and manipulate it to prove the cause of your claim (gravity) is responsible for the observable effect of things falling down. That’s how science works.
If you had actually read thru my posts you would know that I don’t dispute the downward bias which is responsible for the atmospheric pressure gradient:
>>40376139
>>40424504
>>40432590
>after opening a pressurized container inside of a larger vacuum chamber, there is a measurable and consistent pressure gradient both inside the open box and outside in the surrounding vacuum chamber?
> As the size of the vacuum chamber increases, and the relative size of the pressurized box gets smaller, the measurable gradient after opening the lid gets less and less, both inside the box and outside of the box in the surrounding vacuum chamber
>If you agree to this objective fact about gas pressure gradients, how can you deny that an open box of limited size (earth), when exposed to near infinite vacuum chamber (space) would result in no measurable gradient in the small box or in the surrounding near infinite vacuum?
>you will state that micro-gravity environments (like the vomit comet) are fake
Nice strawman. Yet another perfect example of your desperate dependence on logical fallacies to compensate for the obvious lack of substantive evidence for your claims.
I never claimed that gas wasn’t affected by the downward accelerative bias. Gas molecules do have weight bc they have mass. The issue for you is that they don’t have enough weight to prevent them from moving omidirectionally and escaping UP and into a vacuum. Your religion claims that the bending and warping of spacetime is causing the earth to accelerate up towards the gas molecules which prevents them from escaping into the vacuum of space. This is a laughably ridiculous claim on the face of it, but if you actually did want to attempt to scientifically substantiate it, you would first need to isolate the variable of “bending space time” and manipulate it to prove the cause of your claim (gravity) is responsible for the observable effect of things falling down. That’s how science works.
If you had actually read thru my posts you would know that I don’t dispute the downward bias which is responsible for the atmospheric pressure gradient:
>>40376139
>>40424504
>>40432590
>after opening a pressurized container inside of a larger vacuum chamber, there is a measurable and consistent pressure gradient both inside the open box and outside in the surrounding vacuum chamber?
> As the size of the vacuum chamber increases, and the relative size of the pressurized box gets smaller, the measurable gradient after opening the lid gets less and less, both inside the box and outside of the box in the surrounding vacuum chamber
>If you agree to this objective fact about gas pressure gradients, how can you deny that an open box of limited size (earth), when exposed to near infinite vacuum chamber (space) would result in no measurable gradient in the small box or in the surrounding near infinite vacuum?
Page 1