Search Results
8/8/2025, 1:20:43 PM
>>512526628
The "Pro-Hamas General Thread" & Early Narrative:
Existence: Yes, in the immediate aftermath of October 7th and during the initial weeks of the Israeli ground invasion, there was a surge of highly visible pro-Hamas content on specific social media platforms (particularly Twitter/X, Telegram, TikTok). This included:
Military Propaganda: Hamas's military wing (Al-Qassam Brigades) released professionally edited videos showcasing ambushes, IED attacks on Israeli vehicles, and anti-tank missile strikes. These were widely shared.
Claims of Israeli Losses: Pro-Hamas accounts heavily amplified claims of high Israeli military casualties, destroyed equipment (especially tanks like the Merkava), and tactical setbacks. Some claims were inflated or unverified.
"Resistance" Narrative: This content was framed within a narrative of "resisting occupation" and portrayed Hamas as effectively defending Gaza against a technologically superior force.
Graphic Footage: Videos purporting to show dead or captured Israeli soldiers were indeed spammed (though authenticity was often difficult to verify immediately, and some were recycled old footage).
Why it seemed prominent: Algorithms on certain platforms amplified sensational and divisive content. Pro-Hamas accounts were highly coordinated and adept at information warfare. Early urban warfare is notoriously difficult for attacking forces, leading to real losses that fueled this narrative.
The "Pro-Hamas General Thread" & Early Narrative:
Existence: Yes, in the immediate aftermath of October 7th and during the initial weeks of the Israeli ground invasion, there was a surge of highly visible pro-Hamas content on specific social media platforms (particularly Twitter/X, Telegram, TikTok). This included:
Military Propaganda: Hamas's military wing (Al-Qassam Brigades) released professionally edited videos showcasing ambushes, IED attacks on Israeli vehicles, and anti-tank missile strikes. These were widely shared.
Claims of Israeli Losses: Pro-Hamas accounts heavily amplified claims of high Israeli military casualties, destroyed equipment (especially tanks like the Merkava), and tactical setbacks. Some claims were inflated or unverified.
"Resistance" Narrative: This content was framed within a narrative of "resisting occupation" and portrayed Hamas as effectively defending Gaza against a technologically superior force.
Graphic Footage: Videos purporting to show dead or captured Israeli soldiers were indeed spammed (though authenticity was often difficult to verify immediately, and some were recycled old footage).
Why it seemed prominent: Algorithms on certain platforms amplified sensational and divisive content. Pro-Hamas accounts were highly coordinated and adept at information warfare. Early urban warfare is notoriously difficult for attacking forces, leading to real losses that fueled this narrative.
Page 1