Search Results
7/12/2025, 2:17:23 AM
>>936977852
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
7/7/2025, 10:10:25 PM
>>936779309
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
7/6/2025, 1:56:07 AM
>>936694351
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
7/1/2025, 9:58:41 PM
>>936509297
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
Honestly, I've seen way worse, but we can do a lot better. For one thing while that blur can help hide the edges of the edit, it's a noticeable downgrade. For another, most AI needs to be told if it's anything other than a bog standard full body picture facing front straight to the camera. Some of that can be addressed with describing your subject's position/skintone/bodytype/etc with the prompt as well as the quality of the light. You'll eventually get some intuition as to what prompts work best for what kinds of images. Finally, while it didn't come up with this source image, this workflow is completely incapable of handling images larger than 1024x1024 which is frustrating as hell.
Page 1