>>40777956
>Um no, you can read any religious or mythological story and you'll see the same idea in different terms.
I'm very well read on religious and philosophical ideas. I have been reading for 25 years of my adult life.
You don't know shit, you're just trying to shoehorn other beliefs into yours in an effort to confirm them.

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position.

>>16710548
>see picrel and everything should make sense for you rather quickly.
You don't even understand the basics of scientific reasoning.
Either go back to /pol/ or go back to school.