Search Results
7/5/2025, 1:08:27 PM
>>509565855
>https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/italian_dna.shtml#bronze_iron_age
>The Bronze Age was brought to Europe by the Proto-Indo-Europeans, who migrated from the North Caucasus and the Pontic Steppe to the Balkans (from circa 6,000 years ago), then went up the Danube and invaded Central and Western Europe (from 4,500 years ago).
>Italic-speakers, an Indo-European branch, are thought to have crossed the Alps and invaded the Italian peninsula around 3,200 years ago, establishing the Villanova culture and bringing with them primarily R1b-U152 lineages and replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people.
>R1b
>replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people
>In all logic, the ancient Romans, from the original founders of Rome to the patricians of the Roman Republic, should have been essentially R1b-U152 people, with a minority of G2a-L140 (L13, L1264 and Z1816 subclades) and J2a1-L70 (PF5456 and Z2177 subclades).
Proto-Indo-Europeans aka Aryans, same people as northern Europeans, invaded the Mediterranean in the bronze age, genocided the native Neolithic Mediterraneans except for the women who they raped to create a mixed race plebeian underclass.
Then within a couple centuries the city of Rome was born.
Then the Aryan bloodlines ruled as the patricians of Rome for a thousand years.
Thats the timeline of events. You swarthy mongrels aren't speaking your native Med ancestors languages like Etruscan, you speak Indo-European languages like Latin/Italian, Greek etc. which come from Aryan language and is related to Germanic languages.
The actual native Meds were cave dwelling feminists who were ruled over by obese Karens, they were never going to have civilization because you need male rule to create that.
>https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/italian_dna.shtml#bronze_iron_age
>The Bronze Age was brought to Europe by the Proto-Indo-Europeans, who migrated from the North Caucasus and the Pontic Steppe to the Balkans (from circa 6,000 years ago), then went up the Danube and invaded Central and Western Europe (from 4,500 years ago).
>Italic-speakers, an Indo-European branch, are thought to have crossed the Alps and invaded the Italian peninsula around 3,200 years ago, establishing the Villanova culture and bringing with them primarily R1b-U152 lineages and replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people.
>R1b
>replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people
>In all logic, the ancient Romans, from the original founders of Rome to the patricians of the Roman Republic, should have been essentially R1b-U152 people, with a minority of G2a-L140 (L13, L1264 and Z1816 subclades) and J2a1-L70 (PF5456 and Z2177 subclades).
Proto-Indo-Europeans aka Aryans, same people as northern Europeans, invaded the Mediterranean in the bronze age, genocided the native Neolithic Mediterraneans except for the women who they raped to create a mixed race plebeian underclass.
Then within a couple centuries the city of Rome was born.
Then the Aryan bloodlines ruled as the patricians of Rome for a thousand years.
Thats the timeline of events. You swarthy mongrels aren't speaking your native Med ancestors languages like Etruscan, you speak Indo-European languages like Latin/Italian, Greek etc. which come from Aryan language and is related to Germanic languages.
The actual native Meds were cave dwelling feminists who were ruled over by obese Karens, they were never going to have civilization because you need male rule to create that.
7/4/2025, 3:30:11 PM
>>509488526
Ancient Rome and Greece was literally created by Aryans, not native Meds.
>https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/italian_dna.shtml#bronze_iron_age
>Italic-speakers, an Indo-European branch, are thought to have crossed the Alps and invaded the Italian peninsula around 3,200 years ago, establishing the Villanova culture and bringing with them primarily R1b-U152 lineages and replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people.
>Italic tribes conquered the whole peninsula
>In all logic, the ancient Romans, from the original founders of Rome to the patricians of the Roman Republic, should have been essentially R1b-U152 people, with a minority of G2a-L140 (L13, L1264 and Z1816 subclades) and J2a1-L70 (PF5456 and Z2177 subclades).
You're not speaking fucking Etruscan, buddy. The Neolithic Mediterraneans were massacred by Proto-Indo-Europeans, aka Aryans. Then the city of Rome appeared a couple centuries later.
The actual native Meds were matriarchal cucks who worshipped morbidly obese feminists and zero progress happened for tens of thousands of years.
Ancient Rome and Greece was literally created by Aryans, not native Meds.
>https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/italian_dna.shtml#bronze_iron_age
>Italic-speakers, an Indo-European branch, are thought to have crossed the Alps and invaded the Italian peninsula around 3,200 years ago, establishing the Villanova culture and bringing with them primarily R1b-U152 lineages and replacing or displacing a large part of the indigenous people.
>Italic tribes conquered the whole peninsula
>In all logic, the ancient Romans, from the original founders of Rome to the patricians of the Roman Republic, should have been essentially R1b-U152 people, with a minority of G2a-L140 (L13, L1264 and Z1816 subclades) and J2a1-L70 (PF5456 and Z2177 subclades).
You're not speaking fucking Etruscan, buddy. The Neolithic Mediterraneans were massacred by Proto-Indo-Europeans, aka Aryans. Then the city of Rome appeared a couple centuries later.
The actual native Meds were matriarchal cucks who worshipped morbidly obese feminists and zero progress happened for tens of thousands of years.
Page 1