>>7604256
(…) i-its not my fault if i ended up with pigs in the mud originally. the conversation is nonsensical and unproductive, they are desperately attached to the false belief that doubling-down on projection of misconceptions somehow constitute a disproof of an hypothesis, even if the latter is never presented as exclusive pro-active answer in the first place, with the conversationally-trivial but usueless observation that any solution is morally imperfect, exploiting my initial autistic straightforwardness and desire to provide practical applications, and dismissing aphorism such as «perfect is the enemy of good». i think they are legitimately stupid, not as belittlement but as observation. tit-for-tat strategy and self-justice in non-neurodivergent-protective environment are inherently retaliatory, thus unkind communication matching is rational independently of subjective emotions.