Search Results
6/21/2025, 3:57:35 PM
>>11463647
I haven't actually watched Andor yet, got any pics?
>>11463652
....you are correct! Though I do actually like the Interceptor too, but I have only a passing care of Star Wars stuff so I will occasionally get the names wrong for things.
Also, as we're correcting things, I assume you meant to call me "Sweety", as calling me "sweaty" would imply I am perspiring a lot....which I am currently not as I have A/C in my house!
>>11463672
I know air based vehicles are huge in real life, but I always preferred my non-transport ships to be smaller as they're way easier to swoosh about. Even G.I. Joe jets and such like the Ghost Hawks and Firebats are more fun to play with then Sky Strykers, though the latter is far more impressive. Star Wars being Sci-Fi doesn't have to deal with realism though so smaller star fighters would work just fine while larger ships should be bombers and transports so they could fit multiple figures. Even something like the old ARC-170 Starfighter was cool because even though it's a large Starfighter, it had room for three figures giving it far more play value over something like the E-wing, which is similarly large but only fits one character. But I guess more fans care about "movie accuracy" rather then "fun toy features" these days, but I'll always be a "fun toy" first collector.
>>11463786
I'll be honest, I'll take those super simple, cheapo boxes over complex super plastic junk any day. I buy most stuff online and I don't keep the boxes, so outside of some exclusive/rare figures and sets, I really don't care what the box looks like. So the quicker...and quieter...I can get into the box and get my figures out the better.
I haven't actually watched Andor yet, got any pics?
>>11463652
....you are correct! Though I do actually like the Interceptor too, but I have only a passing care of Star Wars stuff so I will occasionally get the names wrong for things.
Also, as we're correcting things, I assume you meant to call me "Sweety", as calling me "sweaty" would imply I am perspiring a lot....which I am currently not as I have A/C in my house!
>>11463672
I know air based vehicles are huge in real life, but I always preferred my non-transport ships to be smaller as they're way easier to swoosh about. Even G.I. Joe jets and such like the Ghost Hawks and Firebats are more fun to play with then Sky Strykers, though the latter is far more impressive. Star Wars being Sci-Fi doesn't have to deal with realism though so smaller star fighters would work just fine while larger ships should be bombers and transports so they could fit multiple figures. Even something like the old ARC-170 Starfighter was cool because even though it's a large Starfighter, it had room for three figures giving it far more play value over something like the E-wing, which is similarly large but only fits one character. But I guess more fans care about "movie accuracy" rather then "fun toy features" these days, but I'll always be a "fun toy" first collector.
>>11463786
I'll be honest, I'll take those super simple, cheapo boxes over complex super plastic junk any day. I buy most stuff online and I don't keep the boxes, so outside of some exclusive/rare figures and sets, I really don't care what the box looks like. So the quicker...and quieter...I can get into the box and get my figures out the better.
Page 1