>>936335210
Megadeth

The atheist position ultimately collapses under its own weight because it lacks a sufficient foundation for the very concepts it relies on, such as logic, morality, and reason. Without God, there is no ultimate standard by which truth, ethics, or rationality can be objectively grounded. The atheist is left appealing to consensus, whether it be the authority of experts or the majority opinion of a culture, but these are contingent and mutable. What is considered "rational" or "moral" today may be overturned tomorrow, and without a transcendent source, there is no fixed reference point to judge between competing systems, nor the possibility of authoritative claims.
If the laws of logic are immaterial, universal, and unchanging, then they cannot arise from a purely material, time-bound, and subjective universe. If reason is a valid pathway to truth, then it must be anchored in something greater than human brains that evolved through random processes for survival, not truth. If moral obligations are real and not merely preferences, they require a moral lawgiver whose nature defines goodness.
In denying God, the atheist still borrows from the Christian worldview to make arguments, trusting in the a priori existence of reason, logic, and objective morality, even while rejecting the only foundation that makes those concepts meaningful. Thus, atheism is internally incoherent. It presupposes the very things that only the existence of God can account for, and in doing so, it affirms what it seeks to deny. Without God, the possibility of intelligible experience itself collapses. Atheism is self-refuting