>>76365308
Both of those are true, I am fat, extremely sedentary(other than 1month of daily walks) and I was going the fastest I could and sweating a lot, but probably it isn't very fast still since it's my first time. I think it read around 27~25 rpm on difficulty 5 out of 9, whatever that means. 181cm 130.6kg 25yo male.

Still, I'm curious as to how many kcal you experienced people burn on it. Like if you can regularly do 300kcal then it's worth for me to keep going at it and improve at cycling, but if even people that are very good at it can only burn like 100kcal then I might as well switch to lifting instead.

>>76365320
I agree, it's just that I feel that I've exhausted everything that I could get with dieting, so I wanted that bonus to speed up weight loss, I just didn't expect it to be so small.

This is me:
>>76364518

Like I feel I can't diet any harder, things are still so painfully slow and I'm still fat so it should be easy to lose weight. Once I'm like 100kg I'll be giga fucked, it'll take me like 8 months to get to 80kg or some shit.