Search Results
7/7/2025, 4:39:31 AM
>>280320851
I'm going to include Otr and Nice Prison since they are relatively new as well.
>Otr
5/10. It had an interesting premise and really good art, but it's obvious that the author has no idea what to do with the script. The story so far looks like a beginner's playthrough of Dragon Quest with the names of the characters and places changed to names from a Wikipedia article on Nordic mythology. In addition, the author constantly adds an excess of elements and text boxes in his pages that distract the reading and worsen the action sequences, which are mediocre mos of the time.
>Nice Prison
1/10. I only read the first chapter before dropping it. The art is bad, the main characters were unlikable, and none of the gags made me smile. Even Murakami, a gag manga that almost everyone hated, was more funny than this. Maybe the jokes are too Japanese for me...
>Harukaze
6/10. It's ridiculously average in every way (kinda like Shinobi until very recently). The art looks good in static scenarios but looks awful when the characters are in movement, and the characters while not being ugly or unlikable, are blatant copypaste of common tropes from yaoi/fujo bait stories. It needs to develop it's own identity in order to survive.
>Kaedegami
7/10. It has a good premise, good art and cute likeable characters (Kou and Chiyou remind me of Ichi and Desscaras when they are close), but its action scenes suck and have no weight just like Otr's. Also Chiyou's bird form is more annoying than cute, like Puck when Miura decided to keep him in his moeblob form.
>Ekiden
0/10. I didn't even finish its first chapter. The characters are ugly and every page was full of text about boring descriptions of everyone. It's just bad.
>Ping Pong
5/10. The art is rough, the pacing of the first chapter was odd and the premise of deathly ping pong matches isn't very interesting, but it has potential to become good if the author manages to find the right dose of surrealism and WTF moments.
I'm going to include Otr and Nice Prison since they are relatively new as well.
>Otr
5/10. It had an interesting premise and really good art, but it's obvious that the author has no idea what to do with the script. The story so far looks like a beginner's playthrough of Dragon Quest with the names of the characters and places changed to names from a Wikipedia article on Nordic mythology. In addition, the author constantly adds an excess of elements and text boxes in his pages that distract the reading and worsen the action sequences, which are mediocre mos of the time.
>Nice Prison
1/10. I only read the first chapter before dropping it. The art is bad, the main characters were unlikable, and none of the gags made me smile. Even Murakami, a gag manga that almost everyone hated, was more funny than this. Maybe the jokes are too Japanese for me...
>Harukaze
6/10. It's ridiculously average in every way (kinda like Shinobi until very recently). The art looks good in static scenarios but looks awful when the characters are in movement, and the characters while not being ugly or unlikable, are blatant copypaste of common tropes from yaoi/fujo bait stories. It needs to develop it's own identity in order to survive.
>Kaedegami
7/10. It has a good premise, good art and cute likeable characters (Kou and Chiyou remind me of Ichi and Desscaras when they are close), but its action scenes suck and have no weight just like Otr's. Also Chiyou's bird form is more annoying than cute, like Puck when Miura decided to keep him in his moeblob form.
>Ekiden
0/10. I didn't even finish its first chapter. The characters are ugly and every page was full of text about boring descriptions of everyone. It's just bad.
>Ping Pong
5/10. The art is rough, the pacing of the first chapter was odd and the premise of deathly ping pong matches isn't very interesting, but it has potential to become good if the author manages to find the right dose of surrealism and WTF moments.
Page 1