Search Results
6/11/2025, 8:53:23 PM
>>105563129
>You should, I get double the speed when connected over wifi.
>Which should count for something.
Yeah the speed difference is undeniable. But most stuff my server is served not as a NAS but in a different way. I need to read files quite often but i really never noticed any speed difference between it and my local SSD.
>That's default SFTP and not KDE fault.
Again its to show that even it will treat it as a local drive. Dolphin can absolutely do networking but it causes issues for me and with it being mounted its all fixed.
>SSHFS uses FUSE which is why it's not "caching".
>And it shouldn't eat up your ram, at most it should be few MBs at most.
It is quite literately saving all files it reads through in /tmp when you search through contents. This is unacceptable for me and while i was searching for ways to have it mounted SSHFS is the first one that popped up and it just works.
>I'd argue FTP is far easier and more compatible than SSHFS across various platforms.
i guess more platforms support FTP but on the ones that do, you are probably using one of them, its no harder than opening a secure shell to your server. You can have it autorun and never notice it doing it.
Not saying that it obsoletes FTP or any other protocol but for me there is no reason to use FTP over it. Well SSHFS uses SFTP as its basis but abstracts it in a way that make my programs work much better.
If i ever decide i want to any high load tasks from my PC to my Server i will check out NFS. I actually did that already but while i was doing it SSHFS came on my radar and i did not see the reason so far to use anything else.
>You should, I get double the speed when connected over wifi.
>Which should count for something.
Yeah the speed difference is undeniable. But most stuff my server is served not as a NAS but in a different way. I need to read files quite often but i really never noticed any speed difference between it and my local SSD.
>That's default SFTP and not KDE fault.
Again its to show that even it will treat it as a local drive. Dolphin can absolutely do networking but it causes issues for me and with it being mounted its all fixed.
>SSHFS uses FUSE which is why it's not "caching".
>And it shouldn't eat up your ram, at most it should be few MBs at most.
It is quite literately saving all files it reads through in /tmp when you search through contents. This is unacceptable for me and while i was searching for ways to have it mounted SSHFS is the first one that popped up and it just works.
>I'd argue FTP is far easier and more compatible than SSHFS across various platforms.
i guess more platforms support FTP but on the ones that do, you are probably using one of them, its no harder than opening a secure shell to your server. You can have it autorun and never notice it doing it.
Not saying that it obsoletes FTP or any other protocol but for me there is no reason to use FTP over it. Well SSHFS uses SFTP as its basis but abstracts it in a way that make my programs work much better.
If i ever decide i want to any high load tasks from my PC to my Server i will check out NFS. I actually did that already but while i was doing it SSHFS came on my radar and i did not see the reason so far to use anything else.
Page 1