>>2067661
Very simple
>Attila
Still reeling off of Rome 2's controversy. No one cared about Late Antiquity at the time, which is why Attila is only a cult classic now. Not helping matters is that Attila is basically a remake of BI which was basically a Rome DLC.
>Thrones of Brittania
Poor man's Medieval. Barely finished. Medieval Anglo history isn't as interesting in a bubble honestly and very overrated.
>Troy
Historically inaccurate and semi-fantasy slop
>Pharaoh
Same as Troy, also shit faction roster, shit visuals and weird gameplay changes. Also the masses don't care about the Bronze Age, and even then it was absolute dogshit Bronze Age representation.

As for Three Kingdoms. That's a history/fantasy hybrid, but so was Troy and Pharaoh, both of which are failures. 3K still cut support because of that Chinese boycott after CA censored lewd mods made by Chinese players.
No shade on fantasyfags btw, I am not into tribalistic faggotry here and I play certain fantasy mods in both Rome 1 and Med 2. The only reason I don't play Warhammer is because I like the older Warhammer Fantasy strategy games more and I don't support CA's bullshit. Besides, CA will always bite the hand that feeds, your loyalty is foolish.

>>2068637
Explain why my favorite mod is Total War Hyrule then?