>>24575209
Again, you have no idea what you are talking about
You just told on yourself by, I think, posting a picture of the cover of a Thomas Piketty book as evidence of you being right
Piketty's conclusion are highly debatable and in my opinion, as someone with an actual professional background in economics, highly doubtful
His conclusions about inequality are based on a theory of the rate of return on capital which are highly debatable to say the last, back to your original reply to me
>These is an S curve regarding inequality, where at a certain point, more inequality actually decreases economic output.
This is unproven nonsense, try again
>Norway wins on GDP per capita.
>B-B-But Norway Wins!!!
This isn't how economics works at all
The United States is obscenely more rich than Norway, has most of the most prestigious universities on Earth, produces the most millionaires and billionaires, medical innovation, I could go on
Youre a socialist, so the whole game is just goalpost moving, when people point out that the United States economy, a country of 330 million, mind you, dwarfs the economies of nation states with pops of 1.4 billion, or a group of countries like the EU with a population more than double ours, you change the metric to GDP per capita while ignoring GDP and other measures of national wealth like GNP, where the United States is clearly out in front, or, you claim that GDP is misleading and you have to measure GDP per head to, as you said, "win", or you use another metric that you do not understand, like PPP, to equate a way to measure the buying power of countries while controlling for exchange rates, with the overall size of their economies, which are two different fucking things, XD
Again, I understand that this is something you believe
>more inequality actually decreases economic output.
This is unproven nonsense
Look at the list
Do you see Norway?
Get better at the game
>B-B-B-But one economist said
Uh-huh, do you think that makes it true?