>>18452223
Your point is vacuous, completely empty. I could post lots of pictures of models who look handsome but where their figure is ruined by the pants. Here's one.

Before you reply in utter rage, as expected, I recommend you check the pictures for the new summer collection on Berg & Berg website. The model is at least as attractive as Viktor Flumé (both are 9/10) but he looks like utter manure in those trousers, which are the same Flumé wore for the winter collection. Simply put, one has a type of body that works with them, the other doesn't. This anon is correct >>18452218