>>64091595
>Why would the risk be any different than the mech-troops firebombing a school?
People react differently when it's a machine taking the shot. It might be retarded, but it's real.

>Those are already there.
and you're massively increasing them for, again, very limited benefits in capability

>No, MASSIVE upgrades in capabilty
stop huffing your own farts. You make it slightly more expensive for your opponent to engage your ground forces. For anything worth deploying these things against that is a complete non-issue.

>As opposed to the psychological problems that will be reported by mech pilots?
Your dreams are not relevant.

Survivability and capability of infantry/infantry equivalent systems are one of the least important factors in a war. You're watching too many action movies.

>>64091603
Retvrn fvrther