>>11315072
>If you're heavily pregnant then I don't exactly want a child, that's really it. As for the rest?
No i mean would you leave the slave there, would you take the slave and abort, take the slave and sell the baby, or would you have the slave raise the baby (either as an heir, or as a slave)
>Since being forced to eat snow is also your favourite thing in the world after being properly subjugated I'd make sure you get to do it all the time when you're outside. Dirt too, during the warmer months.
Sounds horrible, would there at least be some conditioning to make it more enjoyable for the poor slave, or would you rather revel in the sadism from it?

>>11315733
even if there's no need for the chains, it's still a vital part of the aesthetic and feeling. but i know how you feel otherwise. wanting somebody you can be that dependent on, and so reliant on getting their praise, even if it's rarely given, so you have to try and gauge how satisfied the Master is with you/me/us

>>11315951
there would be "organic free-range" plantations, with their own specific brand.
However, they would only give it tot he upper echelon and higher tier slaves raised. Lower classes would be branded with a slight off-shape version of the logo, and sold direct as reduced price fakes with no warranty.
Not only would this increase the brand recognition and value for their high class slaves, but the owning company would also get to dominate the counterfeit market with cheap slop fakes like me.
On the subject of fake scams, there's a lot of money in selling collector's sets, (mother/daughter, sisters, bffs, corrected lovers), so how would you go about instilling it convincingly if you were a seller, or disproving it as the buyer?

>>11316397
should be multiple, at least one is needed on the trampstamp or butt, and another on the tumy and or breast. face is reserved for those who deserve to be looked at with complete revulsion