Search Results
6/22/2025, 8:25:26 PM
Untested Zigger deck
The thought is to keep pushing forward cheap infantry supported by T80s to reveal enemy positions, then destroy infantry-based ones with LMURs, vehicle-based ones with QRF T90s/Armata
Cluster Koalitsaya to hit enemy cargo dumps/support equipment, extended-range TOR to suppress forests/urban buildings with confirmed infantry in them before a push
Sosna up front to cover the tanks, TOR further back for cruise missile attacks. Downside is I only have radars on the TORs, so if they can't stop any SEAD attack on themselves, they're probably dead unless I see it coming
Alligator to counter enemy armor pushes
SU57 for total SAM death
Weaknesses is no long-range SAM defense, poor quality infantry, no MLRS, no bombing capability. It's a grinding attrition deck that's only good at pushing the front
The thought is to keep pushing forward cheap infantry supported by T80s to reveal enemy positions, then destroy infantry-based ones with LMURs, vehicle-based ones with QRF T90s/Armata
Cluster Koalitsaya to hit enemy cargo dumps/support equipment, extended-range TOR to suppress forests/urban buildings with confirmed infantry in them before a push
Sosna up front to cover the tanks, TOR further back for cruise missile attacks. Downside is I only have radars on the TORs, so if they can't stop any SEAD attack on themselves, they're probably dead unless I see it coming
Alligator to counter enemy armor pushes
SU57 for total SAM death
Weaknesses is no long-range SAM defense, poor quality infantry, no MLRS, no bombing capability. It's a grinding attrition deck that's only good at pushing the front
Page 1