Search Results
6/28/2025, 10:20:36 PM
>>17798689
>Not only is he legally entitled to the Davidic throne according to the genealogy of Matthew
Despite the fact that Jesus’s “dad” Joseph has no blood relation to him, and both genealogies run through Joseph (and even different sons of David). It’s literally just a retcon to say “see, he totally technically checked that box.”
Same thing with the convoluted birth stories that explain while Yeshua of NAZARETH is actually totally from Bethlehem technically (since this is another box he has to check). The Bethlehem story also only appears in two Gospels, and only one of them has the incredibly confusing census story that requires traveling to your hometown.
>Not only is he legally entitled to the Davidic throne according to the genealogy of Matthew
Despite the fact that Jesus’s “dad” Joseph has no blood relation to him, and both genealogies run through Joseph (and even different sons of David). It’s literally just a retcon to say “see, he totally technically checked that box.”
Same thing with the convoluted birth stories that explain while Yeshua of NAZARETH is actually totally from Bethlehem technically (since this is another box he has to check). The Bethlehem story also only appears in two Gospels, and only one of them has the incredibly confusing census story that requires traveling to your hometown.
Page 1