>>60542898
No, it was meant for you. I may be assuming a lot here, but are you one of these guys that say it's pathetic to pay for sex if you can't get a girl to sleep with you 'voluntarily' when the only way they can get a girl to sleep with them is by scraping the bottom of the barrel, ie targeting a fat hogs with trashy tattoos?

If so then yes, it was definitely meant for you. I hate those types. Men who belittle Johns but can only manage to sleep with ugly girls and brag about how much of an incel they're not is what's pathetic, not paying for the time of a genuinely attractive woman.

In short prostitution increases the collective sexual bargaining power of men in a society. It enables men of all stripes to have more sex, more frequent, and with more attractive women. Why do you think anti-prostitution laws are mostly supported by women? News flash it isn't trafficking or any such nonsense, it's because it gives them a monopoly on sex in the society, and thus more sexual bargaining power. (what other markets have we seen the same pattern?). And plus it was a practice supported by most men throughout most of history, so you're basically calling all of your forefathers wrong. If you're anti-prostitution then your anti-male and doing the bidding of feminists.