Finally a techtuber with a sizeable audience is explaining to people what retards on this website have refused to accept for a year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HylcIjr2uQw

He's incapable of being succint so the gist of it is:
>If you're upgrading your monitor resolution to play modern vidya in the age of ML-based image reconstruction like DLSS/FSR4, you're better off just skipping 1440p and going directly to 4K.
>DLSS/FSR4 at 4K produces better quality AND better performance than anything 1440p gives you. 1080p to 4k with DLSS looks better than native 1440p while running better as well.
>4K monitors are cheaper than ever before so you don't have to sell a kidney. A Gigabyte M27UP is a 250$ 4K 160hz IPS monitor, if you don't have 250-300$ to spare then why are you upgrading resolution in the first place? OLEDs are still too expensive though.
>GPU comparisons are often done at native resolution with ultra settings to produce honest apples-to-apples comparisons between GPUs, but this isn't really indicative of how to best use a GPU in reality. Medium settings + upscaling to higher output resolutions produces better quality and better performance. Overfixating on resolution labels (e.g. "THIS IS A 1440P GPU.”) is a mistake in this day and age.

Which tech outlet or eceleb fag needs to explain this for you to be convinced?