Search Results
7/3/2025, 3:52:35 AM
>>40264551
No, everyone will be a cute boy. Puberty will no longer even be possible, our genome will not carry the instructions for it.
No, everyone will be a cute boy. Puberty will no longer even be possible, our genome will not carry the instructions for it.
7/1/2025, 10:38:26 AM
>>40242569
>however is because children do not understand sexual relationships in the same way adults do
What evidence do you have for this assertion? Why do you believe this would make a sexual relationship wrong? There are many societies where children freely engage in sexual activities with adults, without controversy:
>Murphy and Quain reported that “there was no heterosexual activity between children, for there were no girls of appropriate age in the village. Thus, pre-pubescent sexual relations occurred between boys or between boys and men, and almost always it was the boys who were the instigators. […] The minor homosexual engagements that took place between the boys themselves were […] in the nature of play”, while no adult homosexuality was seen. “The sexual play of a young child might even include his father”; at least, one is reported to manipulate a boy in erection, without much consideration for observers.
You can read more examples of adult-child sexual behaviour in other societies in this thread: https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17743362
>sex to them is typically not what sex to adults is
The majority of adult-child sexual relationships involve the type of sexual activities which children already engage in with each other, not penetration. The majority of males interviewed by Kinsey reported having at least one pre-pubescent (homo)sexual experience:
>About half of the older males (48%), and nearer two-third (60%) of the boys who were pre-adolescent at the time they contributed their histories, recall homosexual activity in their pre-adolescent years. The mean age of the first homosexual contact is about nine years, two and a half months (9.21 years)
The type of sexual activities pedophiles engage in with children typically do conform to a child's understanding of sexuality.
>>40242589
Neither having an opinion, nor being a pedophile is against the law :-)
>however is because children do not understand sexual relationships in the same way adults do
What evidence do you have for this assertion? Why do you believe this would make a sexual relationship wrong? There are many societies where children freely engage in sexual activities with adults, without controversy:
>Murphy and Quain reported that “there was no heterosexual activity between children, for there were no girls of appropriate age in the village. Thus, pre-pubescent sexual relations occurred between boys or between boys and men, and almost always it was the boys who were the instigators. […] The minor homosexual engagements that took place between the boys themselves were […] in the nature of play”, while no adult homosexuality was seen. “The sexual play of a young child might even include his father”; at least, one is reported to manipulate a boy in erection, without much consideration for observers.
You can read more examples of adult-child sexual behaviour in other societies in this thread: https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17743362
>sex to them is typically not what sex to adults is
The majority of adult-child sexual relationships involve the type of sexual activities which children already engage in with each other, not penetration. The majority of males interviewed by Kinsey reported having at least one pre-pubescent (homo)sexual experience:
>About half of the older males (48%), and nearer two-third (60%) of the boys who were pre-adolescent at the time they contributed their histories, recall homosexual activity in their pre-adolescent years. The mean age of the first homosexual contact is about nine years, two and a half months (9.21 years)
The type of sexual activities pedophiles engage in with children typically do conform to a child's understanding of sexuality.
>>40242589
Neither having an opinion, nor being a pedophile is against the law :-)
ID: jFwyiGG5/pol/508932020#508932020
6/28/2025, 6:38:59 AM
Are there social benefits to homosexuality?
Page 1