Search Results
7/22/2025, 3:23:23 AM
>>716103556
and?
and?
7/15/2025, 10:18:58 AM
>>17843492
He said he liked it when the man performed oral sex on him and only didn't like it when he attempted to perform anal sex on him, and that he actually enjoyed being "abducted" because it was fun and they went to Disneyland. Even though the adult's actions in this situation were inappropriate, it was nowhere near as wrongful as people assume. He was also upset when his father shot him. I heard him say this in an interview.
He grew up in a deeply pedophobic society, where sexual acts between adults and children are viewed as the ultimate violation of social norms, which he assimilated as he reached maturity, and began to regard something he viewed previously as positive or benign as something negative. If you read the thread linked in the OP post, you can read about societies where sexual acts between adults and children are within the realm of acceptability, and in these societies, people who experience positive sexual experiences with adults as children do not undergo a transvaluation of these experiences when they mature. Society brings harm to individuals who had sexual experiences with adults as children by forcing them to view themselves as "victims". Anti-pedos harm children far more than pedophiles do.
>>17843499
>A polemical pedophilia organization's wiki is the only source you have for your arguments
Those studies are published in academic journals. The fact that they are collated on Newgon does not mean they are published by Newgon. Stop refusing to engage with any evidence which contradicts your claims.
>Yeah it does, because otherwise the confounding doesn't matter and there is no need to reclassify CSA.
Rind's study never compares voluntary adult-child sexual contacts with voluntary ones. I have never even claimed that it does. This has nothing to do with the results of his study, which you would know if you had read it. Thanks for continually confirming that you haven't even read these studies which you feel entitled to speak about.
He said he liked it when the man performed oral sex on him and only didn't like it when he attempted to perform anal sex on him, and that he actually enjoyed being "abducted" because it was fun and they went to Disneyland. Even though the adult's actions in this situation were inappropriate, it was nowhere near as wrongful as people assume. He was also upset when his father shot him. I heard him say this in an interview.
He grew up in a deeply pedophobic society, where sexual acts between adults and children are viewed as the ultimate violation of social norms, which he assimilated as he reached maturity, and began to regard something he viewed previously as positive or benign as something negative. If you read the thread linked in the OP post, you can read about societies where sexual acts between adults and children are within the realm of acceptability, and in these societies, people who experience positive sexual experiences with adults as children do not undergo a transvaluation of these experiences when they mature. Society brings harm to individuals who had sexual experiences with adults as children by forcing them to view themselves as "victims". Anti-pedos harm children far more than pedophiles do.
>>17843499
>A polemical pedophilia organization's wiki is the only source you have for your arguments
Those studies are published in academic journals. The fact that they are collated on Newgon does not mean they are published by Newgon. Stop refusing to engage with any evidence which contradicts your claims.
>Yeah it does, because otherwise the confounding doesn't matter and there is no need to reclassify CSA.
Rind's study never compares voluntary adult-child sexual contacts with voluntary ones. I have never even claimed that it does. This has nothing to do with the results of his study, which you would know if you had read it. Thanks for continually confirming that you haven't even read these studies which you feel entitled to speak about.
Page 1