Search Results
5/28/2025, 9:34:53 PM
>>95749021
A ridiculous argument.
Consistency and continuity are pillars of the Law. It doesn't mean a single law can never change.
The lawful lawyer can change a law, not in the name of it's consequences or of the common good, but because he has shown it to be inconsistent with the Law. Such a law targeting a single individual would promptly be shown to be inconsistent.
"Hurr durr lawful means whatever the local lord decides" is such a pedantic argument it doesn't deserve consideration, and barely more than a play on words.
By saying there is nothing more than government fiat, you just show you don't believe in Order at all, which would be fine argument for a chaotic character, but doesn't invalidate the concept.
A ridiculous argument.
Consistency and continuity are pillars of the Law. It doesn't mean a single law can never change.
The lawful lawyer can change a law, not in the name of it's consequences or of the common good, but because he has shown it to be inconsistent with the Law. Such a law targeting a single individual would promptly be shown to be inconsistent.
"Hurr durr lawful means whatever the local lord decides" is such a pedantic argument it doesn't deserve consideration, and barely more than a play on words.
By saying there is nothing more than government fiat, you just show you don't believe in Order at all, which would be fine argument for a chaotic character, but doesn't invalidate the concept.
Page 1