Search Results
8/2/2025, 8:43:37 AM
>>7673350
SEX is degenerate by nature. The goal is to enter, to impose, to subdue, that's the nature of sex in the animal realm. And women are in charge to set the limits on that "natural rape" dynamic in our species. That's a thing, and it is interesting
But I'm more interested in the sadomasochism imposed by People in power, like religious, political and corporation leaders, they hate sex because it goes again their dehumanizing tools. For them an slave, an asset, a beast for labor, shouldn't have a sexual life, because "human cattle" shouldn't be seen as something to be loved, they need to de-sex society. You can't throw bombs on a population full of beautiful creatures you can fall in love with. You can't whip to death a human being that can be seen as a sexual desirable partner. And yet, humans are forced to do all of those horrible things towards their loved ones, through out history, how?
I'm interested in that brutal and intense dichotomy. It's nothing new, it's a common genre, like those novels from the 19th century of irish ladies exiled into slavery to the american colony as punishment for petty crimes, that evolved into cavalry tales like King Arthur or Ivanhoe, then in crime noir, then in 50shades, and slasher films, and so on. It was always there, because sex naturally works like that, it's tragic, it's dramatic, it's intense, it is about life and death.
I'm just still hooked in Gene Wolfe's book, lol. Thecla wanted to choose how to be tortured and it was denied to her. That book is a cesspit of degeneration but no one cancelled Gene Wolfe, no one cancelled Harlan Ellison, Stephen Donaldson, George Bataille, etc because people reckon what the nature of "SEX" implies.
The first "romantic novel" was a tragic tale, a man ordered to execute a beautiful woman he found out he suddenly loved. That's a real love story. The rest is all boring.
>>7673338
Hey, I have no beef with permabegschizo, he's the voice of the people!
>>7673278
Nice Challenge!
SEX is degenerate by nature. The goal is to enter, to impose, to subdue, that's the nature of sex in the animal realm. And women are in charge to set the limits on that "natural rape" dynamic in our species. That's a thing, and it is interesting
But I'm more interested in the sadomasochism imposed by People in power, like religious, political and corporation leaders, they hate sex because it goes again their dehumanizing tools. For them an slave, an asset, a beast for labor, shouldn't have a sexual life, because "human cattle" shouldn't be seen as something to be loved, they need to de-sex society. You can't throw bombs on a population full of beautiful creatures you can fall in love with. You can't whip to death a human being that can be seen as a sexual desirable partner. And yet, humans are forced to do all of those horrible things towards their loved ones, through out history, how?
I'm interested in that brutal and intense dichotomy. It's nothing new, it's a common genre, like those novels from the 19th century of irish ladies exiled into slavery to the american colony as punishment for petty crimes, that evolved into cavalry tales like King Arthur or Ivanhoe, then in crime noir, then in 50shades, and slasher films, and so on. It was always there, because sex naturally works like that, it's tragic, it's dramatic, it's intense, it is about life and death.
I'm just still hooked in Gene Wolfe's book, lol. Thecla wanted to choose how to be tortured and it was denied to her. That book is a cesspit of degeneration but no one cancelled Gene Wolfe, no one cancelled Harlan Ellison, Stephen Donaldson, George Bataille, etc because people reckon what the nature of "SEX" implies.
The first "romantic novel" was a tragic tale, a man ordered to execute a beautiful woman he found out he suddenly loved. That's a real love story. The rest is all boring.
>>7673338
Hey, I have no beef with permabegschizo, he's the voice of the people!
>>7673278
Nice Challenge!
Page 1