>>717092906
And I just want to hilight this post again and point out that it's COMPLETE FANTASY that lawsuits aren't possible and Valve couldn't do anything, it's all it is. I've seen this posted hundreds of times, and no, their hands weren't tied.
Corporations get sued all the time by other corporations. Payment processors and banks get sued. At no point does one get "delisted" and banned from anything if it's a sizable company, such retaliation is illegal and is generally not allowed while litigation is ongoing.

People are gonna make post after post saying how Valve could always do nothing and always has to do nothing when it simply isn't the case, they just didn't want the heat of a lawsuit.
>>717093240
>At the very least they would
They wouldn't, if they lost in this scenario they would be held responsible for all of the lost revenue, and the courts would put a stay on such action anyway. That's generally how it goes in such court cases. You don't get to retaliate against a company that's suing you.

>>511401901
he sounds based, he probably had more important things to do