>>280940664
>Stating that "You can dismiss the criticism" is not a refutation of said criticism
Actually it is especially when you're blatantly wrong


>Further stating that the critics "didn't read it" is likewise little more than a desperate straw man argument that has no bearing on the statements actually being said.
Not really because you actually have to prove that you've read it but you won;t because that would require work and effort which you're clearly don't want to put the effort in