>>714806569
>cod bo6 as if its the 2025's cod
completely forgot that they are in cod bo7 now lmao, its fucking ridiculous when their recycled "triple A" fucking game that is technically a spin off is in its seventh fucking entry (eight entry if you count 2008s WaW which 100% should)

>>714806770
>I'm pretty sure you can still play the original quake 3 safely without needing any patches
I'd love to see that, specially in modern cod games, anyone's done that?

>>714806974
>they cut the game in two and sell it to you over two titles over two years
This has been the case since the first 10 or so entries
>2007's MW was just copy and pasted for MW2 and 3, probably future titttles too
>2008's WaW was given a coat of cold war paint and made into BO1, then a futuristic coat and made into BO2 and 3
They've always been the laziest fucking rehashes, and people who might as well eat shit and say they enjoy it are the kind that blindly waste 60-80 dollars yearly to consume liquid shit the one year the yearly cod gets to be active (Since there is literally 23 fucking COD multiplayers, any resemblence of "community" they might have is solely in the newest game, any older game either gets 100 players like at least the original popular ones, or is fully abandoned)

>>714808045
>everybody from the old days of COD fandom bounced a time ago
Get real, COD """fans""" have been at the single digit IQ kind of people in the mostly impossible to see left part of the curve bell, COD itself is literally the father of shitty 2 hour campaign games with the bottom of the barrel gameplay (shoot bad guys with guns for 2 hours, repeat yearly), and worse of all there is people that unironically praise the very obvious military propaganda ass looking "cinematic" games COD are
In fact, I don't wanna insult liquid shit drinkers, at least liquid fucking diarrhea has more nutritional value than any COD ever

>only thing worth playing is zombies and single player anyways
I agree as a 2005 Xbox kiddy, but-