Search Results
7/1/2025, 6:18:05 PM
>>16711226
>When an organism lives life adhering to practices that preserve health while eschewing all deleterious habits, then the only malfunction it will ever encounter (excepting accidents and injuries) is old age and death, which no intervention can prolong.
>illness doesn't exist outside of accidents, injuries and old age
Will you promise me you won't seek any cancer treatments if you develop it before 80?
>Not so much intelligence as being conditioned into it. A comparison between the two cannot be drawn. You don't need a second opinion when you're feeling ravenous; you just eat.
Given that over half of the developed world is overweight, you absolutely should seek a second opinion if your reaction to hunger is to stuff your face like an animal.
>Doctors are notorious for performing or recommending things that offer no benefit, if not making matters worse.
Such as?
>Why do you think the maxim "An apple a day keeps the doctor away" exists?
Because it does? Fruit is good for you, especially when it replaces processed, sugary snacks. Are you some kind of a keto schizo?
>You were attempting to mock me, but ironically one of the treatments doctors give for heart attacks is aspirin.
No shit, how dense are you?
>Surgery is the main procedure for dealing with heart attacks, which is something I already stated is one of the few things that are actually of any value in the assortment of medicine.
Surgery is in fact not the first option. Stabilising a heart attack is typically entirely pharmacological at first, through aspirin, nitroglycerin and thrombolytics. PCI, which may come next, is a minimally invasive procedure, not a surgery. CABG is only done when there are multiple or severe blockages, but it also can't be done if arteries are too damaged. Prevention include a lifestyle adjustments and medication, again.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, so why talk?
>When an organism lives life adhering to practices that preserve health while eschewing all deleterious habits, then the only malfunction it will ever encounter (excepting accidents and injuries) is old age and death, which no intervention can prolong.
>illness doesn't exist outside of accidents, injuries and old age
Will you promise me you won't seek any cancer treatments if you develop it before 80?
>Not so much intelligence as being conditioned into it. A comparison between the two cannot be drawn. You don't need a second opinion when you're feeling ravenous; you just eat.
Given that over half of the developed world is overweight, you absolutely should seek a second opinion if your reaction to hunger is to stuff your face like an animal.
>Doctors are notorious for performing or recommending things that offer no benefit, if not making matters worse.
Such as?
>Why do you think the maxim "An apple a day keeps the doctor away" exists?
Because it does? Fruit is good for you, especially when it replaces processed, sugary snacks. Are you some kind of a keto schizo?
>You were attempting to mock me, but ironically one of the treatments doctors give for heart attacks is aspirin.
No shit, how dense are you?
>Surgery is the main procedure for dealing with heart attacks, which is something I already stated is one of the few things that are actually of any value in the assortment of medicine.
Surgery is in fact not the first option. Stabilising a heart attack is typically entirely pharmacological at first, through aspirin, nitroglycerin and thrombolytics. PCI, which may come next, is a minimally invasive procedure, not a surgery. CABG is only done when there are multiple or severe blockages, but it also can't be done if arteries are too damaged. Prevention include a lifestyle adjustments and medication, again.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, so why talk?
Page 1