>>95993034
>It was actually 10 percent, but go on
>It was around 45 percent of the meta, but please continue
Pic related. Your pic was several weeks out of date by the time of the ban.
>Control was never an option in 2024/5
There was control in the format before Tarkir. But then again, you probably didn't pay attention and don't even play.
>you don't have a two mana conditional counterspell
There are several. AS someone who actually played control, I'm going to call you on your bullshit.
>change the equation (2 mana cost spells or less, or, up to 6 mana cost for R/G)
>phantom interference
>Assimilate Essence (v. creatures/battle)
>essence scatter
>negate
>Bring the Ending (poison decks; unconditional if 3 poisons on opponent)
>Dazzling Denial (bird decks increased pay in condition cost to 4)
>Dispelling Exhale (beholding dragon increased pay-in condition to 4)
>Flashfreeze (R/G only)
>Long River's Pull (creatures, but gift a draw let you counter anything)
>Reasonable Doubt (suspect creature)
>Spell Stutter (cost went up for each faerie)
But okay. You're retarded.
>>current omniscience combo which will be replaced by a different reanimator deck until the format rotates.
>https://scryfall.com/card/bro/24/repair-and-recharge
Is one such card that will abuelo. Which is why
>replaced by a different reanimator deck
is true. But as a retarded oaf who has proving both his ignorance of the format prior to Tarkir and exhibiting his coarse mind, you certainly would not understand the nuance of a general statement
>replaced by a different reanimator deck until the format rotates.
>Oh look, just one of the many paid shills Hasbro pays to come on here
I'm not payed by Hasbro.
>talk about how banning every deck lets you play FF cards now, cool
Only the 5-6 most format breaking variations of those decks were banned. You can still run most of those decks except cutter and mice even with the bans. They just won't be as strong as before. Vivi was being ran in Cutter BTW.