>>81855362
>sometimes even the most interesting things are written poorly.
you might be right, especially regarding blade runner. if a movie actually gets it's message across, it doesn't need that many cuts.

>sounds cool.
maybe give that a watch next. there's the movie and then there's some shows. maybe you like it. i think the movie hold up quite well visually. just make sure you watch the original and not the 2.0 remaster or whatever they call it.

>>81855506
sorry it took me a bit. getting sleepy myself. (~.~) good night!

>>81855623
hey chev! nice to see you again! (^-^)

>cats been eating up most of my spare time.
i think i missed some major plot developments while i was on vacation... :0 when did you get them?

i'm very sleepy already, so sorry if i don't reply anymore.