>>105807784
>There is nothing special about human motor/visual skills
no, only that you need a chassis, in other words: automation
>You think that AI can work out how to program
id didnt. false assumption

>>105808723
its not an ai problem, its an automation problem
if engineering /research jobs become volontary- you have post scarcity
and you could automate engineering jobs away even today
>>105807162
>>105807177
about meat too, you think you couldnt automate a farm?
>reduce consumption all across the board
yeah nah thats bs. why would we need to do that? artificially reduce industrial output?
>>105809222
yeah, it keeps happening
its not gonna be a wagiepocalypse, people are gonna adjust like they always do
ntm we dont even see layoffs because of ai yet
people cry about microdick flushing their workforce but nobody care that its to hire jeets
its convenient to marketingrtoids to spin the layoffs as an advancing ai