is all there is to strategy and tactics pinning, fire and manouver? it seems to be the prime principle of it. pushing into a frontline without creating movement or the means for future movement is just pointless meatgrinding.
i look at history back a 2000 years and it still was about flanking and concentration of force. logistics is also important to support that manouver.
but as i said above if a war does not let you manouver what is the point? nothing is accomplished and the war goes on and on for years. wars need to be short and decisive, you need to drive deep and hit unexpected points in the frontline or at the enemy army.

>>63844642
Here's a tip. Use a "-" sign to exclude results.
>Example : Russian PBS 1 construction -dead
>>63844648
>at least i had the fucking intelligence to doubt that what google was telling me was actually what i was talking about and make an assumption based off what i know about the soviets instead
Which apparently is absolutely fuck all.
I didn't trust googled AI either, I found better sources. I merely pointed out that you're dumber than it.
You're madder at me for posting from my phone than you are at yourself for your inability to utilize the tools to their fullest capability.
>tl;dr get gud nigger