Search Results
6/30/2025, 1:13:11 AM
>>81661607
It doesn't make a difference whether you call me or my position immature neither of those are real arguments. You might as well have no typed that up, nobody with any presence of mind and intelligence takes that distinction seriously.
Apriori reasoning is always based on evidence so it isn't meant to be taken literally. In a discussion about what constitues evil it means reasoning concerning our ability to moralize, based on what we experience instead of what we believe others are experiencing. I would accept you telling me you can see or hear evil. I won't accept you telling me what's in my head. Which you seem to love doing. Then my job is to question the consistency of your limits. To find out what contradicts/is immoral.
Really there's no one word position to explain this stance, so I just use antinatlism as an umbrella term. In the case of anyone who does not want to risk their kid undergoing the worst the world can throw at the child. Including neurodegenerative diseases, slavery, depression, rape, suicide, prison time etc. Or the fallout that could effect the parent, having a kid is immoral.
Any time someone complains about a problem concerning their child, they're hypocritical and therefore immoral.
Any time someone wants to continue society through procreation yet complains about society, having children is immoral.
These are just extremely common forms of hypocrisy and therefore immorality that make me against having children 99% of the time. In the case of a psychopath who doesn't mind their kid being destroyed, tortured trafficked or whatever that is either amoral, or if they care about the kid but don't mind such risks that's moral.
It doesn't make a difference whether you call me or my position immature neither of those are real arguments. You might as well have no typed that up, nobody with any presence of mind and intelligence takes that distinction seriously.
Apriori reasoning is always based on evidence so it isn't meant to be taken literally. In a discussion about what constitues evil it means reasoning concerning our ability to moralize, based on what we experience instead of what we believe others are experiencing. I would accept you telling me you can see or hear evil. I won't accept you telling me what's in my head. Which you seem to love doing. Then my job is to question the consistency of your limits. To find out what contradicts/is immoral.
Really there's no one word position to explain this stance, so I just use antinatlism as an umbrella term. In the case of anyone who does not want to risk their kid undergoing the worst the world can throw at the child. Including neurodegenerative diseases, slavery, depression, rape, suicide, prison time etc. Or the fallout that could effect the parent, having a kid is immoral.
Any time someone complains about a problem concerning their child, they're hypocritical and therefore immoral.
Any time someone wants to continue society through procreation yet complains about society, having children is immoral.
These are just extremely common forms of hypocrisy and therefore immorality that make me against having children 99% of the time. In the case of a psychopath who doesn't mind their kid being destroyed, tortured trafficked or whatever that is either amoral, or if they care about the kid but don't mind such risks that's moral.
Page 1