>>6235886
"There is one alternative already put on the table by one of your own which might allow for a degree of compromise. Creating the "hybrid military reserve" proposed by >>6234458 would allow for recruitment and training costs to be considerably reduced for the same effect if members of this reserve would be forwarded to the MVDO for assignment into internal roles. Additionally, and this is an idea proposed by the HCEK, allowing women to be recruited into the Internal Ministry's forces so long as they pass the same fitness requirements as their male counterparts may also help with sourcing manpower. Ultimately, the decision is up to you to decide."

Where should funding be allocated?
>The MVDO approached us first, so they deserve the lion's share.
>A State Security agency developed from the Stasi and КГБ could end up being the best in the world! We can find other ways to fund the MVDO.
>Write-in

Should we implement the reforms for the military?
>A strong, capable, if slightly smaller military would fix a number of problems before they arise; not to mention plenty of reserves in case of wartime.
>No, we don't need to reduce the size of the military.
>Write-in

Should the MVDO be allowed to recruit women?
>So long as they can meet the standards expected of any other recruit, why not?
>Women? Even in the internal forces? They can't be serious.
>Write-in