>>11485239
>needing to pull your toy apart to prevent it from breaking because people on /toy/ were shearing their joints apart due to 4H not paying for quality control on them isn't bad!!!!!
Sure is downplaying 4H's fuck ups because you need to shill for 4H.

>>11485218
>still needing to lie about how all other toys are bad because he needs to deflect criticism from 4H overcharging for rotocast toys and cheaping out on QC
see >>11484288 Everything was already proven wrong, hence you need to misread the review, pretend it was written earlier than it was, and move the goalpost for what rot is

also
>having a problem with me posting 2+2=4
Yeah, because being right in 2019 that 4H doesn't pay for quality control for their overpriced toys suddenly makes it wrong if it's posted one too many times.

Again, the images are just to prove how 4H doesn't respond to problems or takes years and years, because it shows why the continue having problems today: they're greedy cunts who cut corners.