Search Results
6/25/2025, 4:59:58 AM
6/17/2025, 2:18:18 AM
6/15/2025, 2:52:36 AM
### **The Premise: Quantum Non-Locality Is an Illusion**
the truth is far simpler and far more intuitive.
### **The Real Story: The Oscillation Trail Effect**
- Particles oscillating at speed **c** naturally create a trail.
- What we call a "wave" is not an intrinsic wave—it’s a **blurred artifact of motion**.
- This is the **same reason a spinning fan appears as a disk**—the high-speed oscillation gives the illusion of a spread-out wave.
### **How This Explains the Bell’s Inequality Setup**
Let’s go back to the famous polarization experiments:
- When a photon hits a polarization filter at **45°**, it has a **50% chance** of passing.
- If we use two 45° filters in sequence, it **adjusts twice** instead of once at **90°**, which makes it **easier to pass.**
- Once a photon has passed through a filter, it is now aligned with that filter. **If it then encounters another filter at an angle less than 90° relative to the first, it will pass through 100% of the time.**
This is perfectly described by the formula:
```
P = cos2(θ)
```
Where:
- **P** = Probability of the particle passing the polarization filter.
- **θ** = Angle between the photon’s oscillation and the filter’s axis.
### **Why Bell’s Inequality Violations Are Just Geometric Artifacts**
Bell’s theorem assumes that probabilities should behave like classical random variables. However, when **you account for the oscillation-based wave illusion**, you naturally get:
```
E(θ_A, θ_B) = ⟨cos(θ_A - θ_B)⟩
```
Which **exactly matches** what quantum mechanics predicts—but without requiring non-locality or hidden variables.
**The illusion of entanglement disappears.**
**Spooky action at a distance was never real.**
**Bell’s Inequality violations are just measurement artifacts of oscillation and motion.**
the truth is far simpler and far more intuitive.
### **The Real Story: The Oscillation Trail Effect**
- Particles oscillating at speed **c** naturally create a trail.
- What we call a "wave" is not an intrinsic wave—it’s a **blurred artifact of motion**.
- This is the **same reason a spinning fan appears as a disk**—the high-speed oscillation gives the illusion of a spread-out wave.
### **How This Explains the Bell’s Inequality Setup**
Let’s go back to the famous polarization experiments:
- When a photon hits a polarization filter at **45°**, it has a **50% chance** of passing.
- If we use two 45° filters in sequence, it **adjusts twice** instead of once at **90°**, which makes it **easier to pass.**
- Once a photon has passed through a filter, it is now aligned with that filter. **If it then encounters another filter at an angle less than 90° relative to the first, it will pass through 100% of the time.**
This is perfectly described by the formula:
```
P = cos2(θ)
```
Where:
- **P** = Probability of the particle passing the polarization filter.
- **θ** = Angle between the photon’s oscillation and the filter’s axis.
### **Why Bell’s Inequality Violations Are Just Geometric Artifacts**
Bell’s theorem assumes that probabilities should behave like classical random variables. However, when **you account for the oscillation-based wave illusion**, you naturally get:
```
E(θ_A, θ_B) = ⟨cos(θ_A - θ_B)⟩
```
Which **exactly matches** what quantum mechanics predicts—but without requiring non-locality or hidden variables.
**The illusion of entanglement disappears.**
**Spooky action at a distance was never real.**
**Bell’s Inequality violations are just measurement artifacts of oscillation and motion.**
Page 1