Search Results
7/19/2025, 4:52:30 AM
>>18490378
I've worn both the 634 and 1955. I have an athletic build and prefer the 1955 slightly. The higher rise and slightly larger thighs allows for more mobility and comfort on my part. I like the 634 for what it is, but I have no clue why Iron Heart was so insistent on making the rise LOW. They could easily add another 0.5 inches to the rise and be well within the ball park of an actual 60s repro cut. Beside that, they have some weird insistence on adding weird, completely unnecessary modifications to their cuts. For example, the absurd magnitude of taper on the 1955 below the knee was completely unnecessary. The cut is essentially a legit 1955 cut, but they were like, "lets appeal to all the aging millennials and gen x crowd by making this a 'tapered' cut". It would look a million times better if they reduced the taper a significant amount.
>>18490379
Currently rocking their 0105 in the 13.7 oz this summer. I started my raw denim journey with heavy weight stuff, but after wearing in some Fullcounts, I could say I would not be disappointed at all if strictly wore their jeans and nothing else. The fades are really balanced, the denim is silky smooth, and the cuts are really functional. Absolutely no gimmicks.
I've worn both the 634 and 1955. I have an athletic build and prefer the 1955 slightly. The higher rise and slightly larger thighs allows for more mobility and comfort on my part. I like the 634 for what it is, but I have no clue why Iron Heart was so insistent on making the rise LOW. They could easily add another 0.5 inches to the rise and be well within the ball park of an actual 60s repro cut. Beside that, they have some weird insistence on adding weird, completely unnecessary modifications to their cuts. For example, the absurd magnitude of taper on the 1955 below the knee was completely unnecessary. The cut is essentially a legit 1955 cut, but they were like, "lets appeal to all the aging millennials and gen x crowd by making this a 'tapered' cut". It would look a million times better if they reduced the taper a significant amount.
>>18490379
Currently rocking their 0105 in the 13.7 oz this summer. I started my raw denim journey with heavy weight stuff, but after wearing in some Fullcounts, I could say I would not be disappointed at all if strictly wore their jeans and nothing else. The fades are really balanced, the denim is silky smooth, and the cuts are really functional. Absolutely no gimmicks.
Page 1