>>63979464
>So, if a drone can communicate despite the EM shielding then your HPM system is useless, amirite?
FPS fiber optic drones can communicate in an EW saturated environments with HPMs active? May I see these tests or combat data that proves this?
>>why did I mention fiber-optic communication? hello
Because you're a coping retard.
>>63979505
>Spot size of HPM weapons. Picrel by the Army (you can find the original pdf).
Then find it.
>micro-scale thermal destruction.
OH, so it does cause thermal damage. Got it.

>For HPM if you can't destroy the RF front end then the effect is nil regardless the dwell time.
Proof?
>Your microwave...
Proof?
>Fiber-Optic drones, drones using optical fiber for wired communication.
So, a short ranged low capacity last ditch effort grenade with a please bomb my ass to hell short cable that leads right to them? lol lmao even,
>>Proof?
>Every, single, Radar or power transceiver. And no, you can protect a RF input without losing signal reception but I don't want to mention RF circulators