>>717811165
yes i also understand what luckybancho is stop explaining the methodologies to me it's not necessary after clearing up how playerscope scrapes. my sticking point is the ENORMOUS discrepancy going on. as in luckybancho is recording, as of june 21st, 648,000 or 578,000 (depending on choice of may 25th or july 27th as most recent comparable data point) successful recency points that don't exist or are arbitrary. that is so high a number and playerscope under so much scrutiny and active tampering by square enix at that point that i do not trust playerscope's number.