>>17831070
>Nowhere near close to where the Exodus myth is supposed to have happened, and there is no Egyptian record of anything in the Exodus.
This is literally Egyptian written evidence of nomadic Semites called the Shashu that worshipped a God with an identical name to the Tetragrammaton that were a captive enemy people of Egypt. Evidence of the Shashu in Egyptian history is abundant, and this inscription puts it beyond all doubt that they were Israelites.
>The Deluge is supposed to be worldwide.
Many ancient Mesopotamian kings were titled “King of the World”, this was a relative term back then as people did not know about the entire globe.
>The first Jews didn't see it that way, they very much believed that Adam and Eve were real people.
The first Jews spoke Hebrew and therefore clearly understood that Adam is a representation of mankind rather than biographical journalism. Even the Kabbalah interprets Genesis 1 symbolically, so you can hardly argue this is modern post-19th century revision, this has been current since the earliest days of Rabbinic Judaism. You’re just projecting Christian theology onto a religion that never had it.
>there is ample evidence for Alexander the Great, on the other hand,
Can you show me some evidence of Alexander’s existence that does not come centuries after his death? Pro tip, you can’t because it doesn’t exist.