>>531906317
>it's simultaneously good and also ass
With respect, this is a useless statement. Is it a good entry for somebody who's never played an MH before?
>>531906430
>>531906691
So would playing an older entry be a better idea for somebody wanting an authentic or more form-fitting MH experience? My concern is that the last one won't have as robust as a playerbase now that Wilds has been out for almost a year.
>>531906234
>>531906570
Gamers please, let's try to stay on task here

>>529527805
*dies*