Search Results
7/30/2025, 6:39:38 PM
>>64052971
>They didn’t want abolition, since it was tied with integration, they wanted them sent back
This is like claiming that troonism isn't a major Democrat platform today since actually only a relatively small number of people support it. Most of the North favored gradual slave emancipation in some form with a small number of hardline liberal activists supporting immediate total abolition of slavery and integration of blacks into American society (which is what ultimately happened).
>They were tired of slavers and slave, and southtards just had to through a fit and die over it.
This makes no sense, because it was the South that tried to leave peacefully, while the North wanted war going so far as to use Fort Sumter as bait knowing the South would have no choice but to attack once it declared independence. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was the most popular book in the country next to the Bible during the 19th Century. The average Northerner was absolutely a bleeding heart, and John Brown became insanely popular up there thanks to the hatred toward Southerners caused in no small part by that book. Their descendants lionize school shooters today if the shooter is a troon and the victims are white Southern Christian children. There is generational bloodlust in "white" Northerners towards white Southerners all because we mistreated he heckin wholesome niggerinos 200 years ago.
>>64052903
That map doesn't mean the North didn't have lots of slaves. All it means is that slaves were a greater percentage of the population as a whole in the South. New York also had lots of slaves up until the 1820's, but their population of whites was much greater, so the percentage of slaves as a portion of the total population was smaller.
>They didn’t want abolition, since it was tied with integration, they wanted them sent back
This is like claiming that troonism isn't a major Democrat platform today since actually only a relatively small number of people support it. Most of the North favored gradual slave emancipation in some form with a small number of hardline liberal activists supporting immediate total abolition of slavery and integration of blacks into American society (which is what ultimately happened).
>They were tired of slavers and slave, and southtards just had to through a fit and die over it.
This makes no sense, because it was the South that tried to leave peacefully, while the North wanted war going so far as to use Fort Sumter as bait knowing the South would have no choice but to attack once it declared independence. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was the most popular book in the country next to the Bible during the 19th Century. The average Northerner was absolutely a bleeding heart, and John Brown became insanely popular up there thanks to the hatred toward Southerners caused in no small part by that book. Their descendants lionize school shooters today if the shooter is a troon and the victims are white Southern Christian children. There is generational bloodlust in "white" Northerners towards white Southerners all because we mistreated he heckin wholesome niggerinos 200 years ago.
>>64052903
That map doesn't mean the North didn't have lots of slaves. All it means is that slaves were a greater percentage of the population as a whole in the South. New York also had lots of slaves up until the 1820's, but their population of whites was much greater, so the percentage of slaves as a portion of the total population was smaller.
Page 1