Search Results
7/16/2025, 10:25:30 PM
>>58003787
The entire concept of polyamory just falls flat, if we think of concepts like trust or loyality. In a monogamous relationship, you have to show your affection to one person, and vice versa. In a polyamorous relationship however, you have to show the same affection to one more or multiple people (depends on how expanded and degenerate the polyamory is). It's already hard to love one person, so how do you manage to show equal and fair affection to multiple people? The answer is simple: You don't. It's impossible, and anyone believing this is either gaslighting oneself or searching for an excuse to embrace a degenerate lifestyle. So sooner or later, cracks start to form, which leads to jealousy and in the end to a break up.
>>58003905
>However modern western culture has sunken into degeneracy and abandoned everything that kept it together.
It's intentional. At least there's no other explanation for why this happens.
>>58003989
It's the same dynamic why women tend to vote left. Women are more keen on being part of a social group and therefore more open to adopting social norms. Meanwhile, men tend to be on their own, valuing moral values they believe are good.
Last thing, I think there was a study which showed that there was a massive increase of people identifying as LGTV+ over the last decades. Don't know the exact number, but it was out of proportions (like, +1000%). Also interesting that this only applied to younger people, not older generations, which is remarkable considering there were more than enough opportunities to come out anonymously.
I'm no expert, but such massive demographic shifts are usually associated with artificial or sudden changes (like lots of people dying in wars), so this isn't people embracing their true self, but rather joining a harmful trend.
Unfortunately, I don't know where the source came from exactly. Perhaps someone else knows what I'm refering to.
The entire concept of polyamory just falls flat, if we think of concepts like trust or loyality. In a monogamous relationship, you have to show your affection to one person, and vice versa. In a polyamorous relationship however, you have to show the same affection to one more or multiple people (depends on how expanded and degenerate the polyamory is). It's already hard to love one person, so how do you manage to show equal and fair affection to multiple people? The answer is simple: You don't. It's impossible, and anyone believing this is either gaslighting oneself or searching for an excuse to embrace a degenerate lifestyle. So sooner or later, cracks start to form, which leads to jealousy and in the end to a break up.
>>58003905
>However modern western culture has sunken into degeneracy and abandoned everything that kept it together.
It's intentional. At least there's no other explanation for why this happens.
>>58003989
It's the same dynamic why women tend to vote left. Women are more keen on being part of a social group and therefore more open to adopting social norms. Meanwhile, men tend to be on their own, valuing moral values they believe are good.
Last thing, I think there was a study which showed that there was a massive increase of people identifying as LGTV+ over the last decades. Don't know the exact number, but it was out of proportions (like, +1000%). Also interesting that this only applied to younger people, not older generations, which is remarkable considering there were more than enough opportunities to come out anonymously.
I'm no expert, but such massive demographic shifts are usually associated with artificial or sudden changes (like lots of people dying in wars), so this isn't people embracing their true self, but rather joining a harmful trend.
Unfortunately, I don't know where the source came from exactly. Perhaps someone else knows what I'm refering to.
Page 1