>>534008982
>being a casualry is a bad thing
>some people are shown to like it just fine and they don't have to go any dangerous missions. they get to live peaceful lives
>some people complain and say casualries are oppressed and that luxorers are treated better unfairly
what do you guys think? there are some cases where i do think luxorers get treated better for no reason like with navarre. but with samurai being luxorers it makes sense. they have to go on dangerous missions and be leaders so the casualries can stay safe. it makes sense why samurai receive a higher standard of living when they get chosen.