Search Results
7/5/2025, 6:32:51 PM
>>96019058
No, one keeps the interior in.That is a big difference. Void is nothing, literally, you dont keep it out you keep atmosphere and pressure in. Dont let NASA training videos confuse you. Void sealed does not equal corrosive/flame resistant by default. It may at best be water resistant up to a certain depth.
Take picrel, a shockingly realistic depiction of what phospex and flamers would do. It would eat the weaker seals in the joints and flood the interior leaving the armor intact. The marine could survive indefinitely in the void and perhaps even certain ocean depths, but when exposed to something hot and/or corrosive enough there are no materials that keep the joints flexible enough that could resist it.
No, one keeps the interior in.That is a big difference. Void is nothing, literally, you dont keep it out you keep atmosphere and pressure in. Dont let NASA training videos confuse you. Void sealed does not equal corrosive/flame resistant by default. It may at best be water resistant up to a certain depth.
Take picrel, a shockingly realistic depiction of what phospex and flamers would do. It would eat the weaker seals in the joints and flood the interior leaving the armor intact. The marine could survive indefinitely in the void and perhaps even certain ocean depths, but when exposed to something hot and/or corrosive enough there are no materials that keep the joints flexible enough that could resist it.
Page 1